1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1987 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1987 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1987 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 1987 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 230 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1987 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | 209 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1955 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1116 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2460 mm |