1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1995 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1995 Opel Kadett is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Opel Kadett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Opel Kadett (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Opel Kadett should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1995 Opel Kadett | |
| Make | Abarth | Opel |
| Model | 209 | Kadett |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |
