1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1996 Kia Retona
To start off, 1996 Kia Retona is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Kia Retona (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Kia Retona weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1996 Kia Retona | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 209 | Retona |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2370 mm |