1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 1998 Acura EL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura EL weights approximately 469 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | Abarth | Acura |
Model | 209 | EL |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2619 mm |