1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 620 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 209 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2210 mm |
