1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1999 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1999 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota 4Runner (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1229 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1999 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 209 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1839 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 87 L |
