1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 665 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 209 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 132 L |