1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 902 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Abarth | Subaru |
| Model | 209 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 91.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1512 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2680 mm |
