1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton 400 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2003 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Abarth | Proton |
| Model | 209 | 400 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2510 mm |
