1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
| Model | 209 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
