1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Smart ForTwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,087 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Abarth 209 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 2004 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 209 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 33 L |