1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1229 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 209 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1839 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 87 L |
