1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 209 | S60 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |