1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 209 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 95 L |