1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 209 | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |