1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura CSX weights approximately 703 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2008 Acura CSX | |
Make | Abarth | Acura |
Model | 209 | CSX |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |