1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 923 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Abarth | Honda |
| Model | 209 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1533 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 58 L |
