1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,985 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 2290 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 209 | Commander |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2985 cc |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 78 L |