1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,149 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 375 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 209 | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |