1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,812 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 750 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 209 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1812 cc |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
