1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
Model | 209 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 95.9 mm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 206 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |