1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 209 | Titan |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 106 L |