1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2010 Opel Combo | |
Make | Abarth | Opel |
Model | 209 | Combo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 80.6 mm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 52 L |