1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 209 | SL |
Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1298 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |