1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (323 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1202 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 209 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 323 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |