1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 956 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 209 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1566 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 61 L |
