1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1326 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 209 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 85 L |