1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Cee'd (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 653 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Abarth 209 2012 Kia Cee'd
Make Abarth Kia
Model 209 Cee'd
Year Released 1955 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1087 cc 1591 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 65 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68 mm 77.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.9 mm 85.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 610 kg 1263 kg
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4240 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 950 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 53 L