1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1392 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 209. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
Model | 209 | XF |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2909 mm |