1955 Abarth 209 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Smart Fortwo weights approximately 230 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 209 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 33 L |