1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1955 Abarth 210 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Triumph Mayflower (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Triumph Mayflower should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 540 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Abarth | Triumph |
Model | 210 | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1955 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 100 mm |
Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 106 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |