1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1952 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1955 Abarth 210 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 633 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Abarth 210 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 210 (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 210 should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Citroen 2CV weights approximately 85 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1952 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | 210 | 2CV |
Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 11 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 62 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 19 L |