1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1960 Ford Zodiac is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 781 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 210 | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |
