1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1963 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 1963 Steyr Haflinger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 643 cc (2 cylinders), 1963 Steyr Haflinger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 210 (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 210 should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Steyr Haflinger weights approximately 190 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1963 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 210. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1963 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Abarth | Steyr |
| Model | 210 | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 2840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 1510 mm |
