1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | 210 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |
