1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1620 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 210 | 62 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 75 L |