1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 1964 Sunbeam Imp is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 875 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Imp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Imp weights approximately 337 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
| Make | Abarth | Sunbeam |
| Model | 210 | Imp |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 875 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 747 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 27 L |
