1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 1965 Renault 4 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 746 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Renault 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 33 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Renault 4 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1965 Renault 4 | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 210 | 4 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |