1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 470 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Abarth | Triumph |
Model | 210 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 53 L |