1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 720 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1981 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Abarth | Oldsmobile |
Model | 210 | Omega |
Year Released | 1955 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2670 mm |