1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 510 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 210 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 1439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2390 mm |
