1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1996 Fiat Duna
To start off, 1996 Fiat Duna is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Duna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Duna (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Duna should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Duna weights approximately 520 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Duna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1996 Fiat Duna | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | 210 | Duna |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 79.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2370 mm |