1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 562 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 210 | Midge |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1400 mm |
