1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1997 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1997 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 1997 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 210 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 2962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2760 mm |
