1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1998 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1998 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 210 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 4598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 5330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1950 mm |