1955 Abarth 210 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Clio weights approximately 525 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 210 | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |