1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 210 | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 51 L |
