1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (238 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 928 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 210 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1338 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 61 L |