1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 210 | Megane |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2690 mm |