1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 210. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 210 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |
